In the year and a half since, the term "Web 2.0" has clearly taken hold, with more than 9.5 million citations in Google. But there's still a huge amount of disagreement about just what Web 2.0 means, with some people decrying it as a meaningless marketing buzzword, and others accepting it as the new conventional wisdom.
This article is an attempt to clarify just what we mean by Web 2.0.
In our initial brainstorming, we formulated our sense of Web 2.0 by example:
Web 1.0 | Web 2.0 | |
---|---|---|
DoubleClick | --> | Google AdSense |
Ofoto | --> | Flickr |
Akamai | --> | BitTorrent |
mp3.com | --> | Napster |
Britannica Online | --> | Wikipedia |
personal websites | --> | blogging |
evite | --> | upcoming.org and EVDB |
domain name speculation | --> | search engine optimization |
page views | --> | cost per click |
screen scraping | --> | web services |
publishing | --> | participation |
content management systems | --> | wikis |
directories (taxonomy) | --> | tagging ("folksonomy") |
stickiness | --> | syndication |
No comments:
Post a Comment